One intake
The team should not need to write several prompts. The useful starting instruction is simply: analyze this document.
Bid-readiness support for construction, energy, MEP and infrastructure teams
Bid risk review for tender teams under deadline.
Send the tender file, previous bid material or material-supply need. We return a review-ready pack with a pre-bid checklist, compliance matrix, risk register, clarification questions and procurement timing notes.
48h
File received
Review pack in 48 hours
Review-ready, not legally-binding — final submission requires bidder counter-review.
OwnerIssueStatus
EligibilityWork reference below thresholdBlocking
FinanceBid bond lead timeHigh
TechnicalGrid approval unclearHigh
SupplyPanel lead time exposedMedium
File set
Tender, RFP, prior bid or supply need
Outputs
Checklist, matrix and risk register
Review
Bidder counter-review required
Delivery
Concierge service, no dashboard
Most bid risk becomes visible too late.
Tender preparation is spread across email, spreadsheets, legal documents and supplier calls. Decision-makers need to see blocking clauses, missing evidence and timing pressure before the writing work starts.
Decision visibility
Managers need to see disqualification risk, missing evidence and timing pressure before the team starts writing.
Procurement reality
Material decisions need stock, lead time, supplier reliability and scope impact, not only a listed unit cost.
What your team receives
The pack is shaped like the artifacts a bid team already uses: checklist, matrix, risk register, clarification list and supply timing board.
Management handoff
Pre-bid checklist
A short management view of go / no-go gates, deadline risks, required documents, owners and unresolved questions.
01Blocking clausesPriority
02Missing evidenceOwner set
03Deadline pressureScheduled
04Open questionsSent to buyer
Traceable table
Compliance matrix
Requirements mapped to status, evidence path, owner and severity so the team can see what is ready and what is exposed.
RequirementStatusRisk
Bid bondNeededHigh
Work referencePartialBlocking
Bid risk
Risk register
Disqualification traps, ambiguous clauses, hidden cost items and timing risks ranked by severity and next action.
High
Medium
Low
Question list
Clarification questions
Buyer-facing questions grouped by legal, financial, technical, delivery and scope risk before the addendum deadline.
1Clause ambiguity
2Delivery scope
3Bid bond timing
Procurement support
Supply timing board
For material procurement: supplier shortlist, stock status, lead time, fair or market signals and true schedule impact.
Stock
Likely
Lead
3-5 wk
Impact
Schedule
Have a tender file on your desk?
Send the document and one sentence about the decision you need. We confirm fit first, then return the review pack around the deadline.
Sample risk matrix from a public tender
The sample pack is built from a public solar-power tender. It shows the expected level of specificity: row-level requirements, owners, evidence paths and risk bands.
Public sample only. We are not bidding, advising or representing any party in that tender.
| Clause | Requirement | Status | Owner | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4.1 | Trade registry certificate | Available | Legal | Low |
| 4.3 | Bid bond preparation | Needed | Finance | High |
| 5.2 | Solar work reference threshold | Partial | Business development | Disqualifying |
| 7.4 | Grid-operator preliminary approval | Needed | Engineering | High |
Material supply review follows availability and lead time.
When the issue is procurement rather than bid writing, the output shifts to supplier options, availability, lead time and the real time, cost and scope tradeoff.
ItemSourceLead timeSignal
Solar panelsTwo distributors3-5 weeksSchedule risk
InvertersLocal stock likely1-2 weeksLow risk
Steel structureFabricator quote needed2-4 weeksCost risk
CablingCommodity itemSame weekLow risk
Concierge review, not a self-serve dashboard.
There is no login, prompt library or dashboard to manage. The buyer sends documents; we return the review pack and walk through the risks when needed.
Good fit
- Small and mid-sized engineering, construction, MEP, energy and infrastructure bidders.
- Teams preparing public tender or RFP responses with limited proposal capacity.
- Procurement teams comparing supplier options, stock, lead time and true cost.
Not a fit
- Bidders asking us to sign, certify or submit the bid.
- Legal or accounting advice requiring licensed professional liability.
- Large proposal departments that already have a mature bid office.
Two packs. One pipeline.
The difference is the page ceiling and how deep the human review pass goes — not a different product. Prices are per pack, not a subscription.
Normal
24 hoursEnough to decide whether the bid is worth a team.
€199per pack
- Scope
- Up to ~150 pages
- Turnaround
- 24 hours
- Go / no-go decision view
- Top blockers, ranked by severity
- Missing evidence list
- Deadline and key-date map
Pro
48 hoursThe full review-ready pack, plus a walkthrough before you submit.
€699per pack
- Scope
- Up to ~500 pages
- Turnaround
- 48 hours
- Everything in Normal
- Full pre-bid checklist
- Compliance and eligibility matrix
- Risk register with mitigations
- Clarification questions by category
- Draft technical response section
- One walkthrough call
50% on engagement, 50% on delivery. Tenders above the Pro page ceiling, or turnarounds under 24 hours, are quoted separately.
Prices shown in EUR (€) · Billing in another currency on request.
Both packs ship review-ready, not legally-binding — final submission requires bidder counter-review.
Before teams share a file
Do we need to give several instructions?
+
No. The service is designed around one intake. Send the file and tell us the decision you need to make.
Can you use our past tender documents?
+
Yes. Past tender packs can reveal repeated risks, missing evidence patterns and clauses that often create timing pressure.
Can this support material procurement?
+
Yes. For supply decisions, the pack shifts toward supplier scan, stock status, lead time and time-cost-scope impact.
Do you submit the bid?
+
No. The bidder reviews, signs and submits. We prepare review-ready material that supports that decision.